2 comments on “Making MEAP Real

  1. The main obstacle I see in Microsoft MEAP is dependency on number of softwares and moreover these do not seem to be tightly integrated. So both design and development is a challenge. Above all, it is just for Microsoft enabled devices. There are very less enterprises in the world who are solely depend upon Microsoft devices.

  2. Mr. Tiffany,

    I am curious as to how MEAP will evolve to support Windows Phone 7 and Windows Embedded Standard 7 devices? Especially because there seems to be very little concrete information that the Windows Phone team is sharing about enterprise management of WP7-handsets and private application deployment to the same.

    I’m also concerned about the lack of SSCE in WP7 and how I could work around it to allow usage of structured data-heavy enterprise applications in enforced connectivity dead zones. (e.g. planes, radio blackboxes etc.)

    I can’t give you specifics about my organization here but it is a higher-education institution with 5k+ managed PCs while mobile is in its infancy (currently considering/prototyping iPhone apps).

    Budgetary constraints prevent folks like me from attending TechEd etc. this year. Also why we’re piloting more open-source products like Zimbra etc. and consciously switching away from integrated Microsoft solutions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>