Sync Framework

All posts tagged Sync Framework

Sync Framework v4 is now Open Source, and ready to Connect any Device to SQL Server and SQL Azure

Posted by Rob Tiffany on September 11, 2011
Posted in: Sync Framework. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 10 comments

The profound effects of the Consumerization of IT (CoIT) is blurring the lines between consumers and the enterprise.  The fact that virtually every type of mobile device is now a candidate to make employees productive means that cross-platform, enabling technologies are a must.  Luckily, Microsoft has brought the power to synchronize data with either SQL Server on-premise or SQL Azure in the cloud to the world of mobility.  If you’ve ever synched the music on your iPhone with iTunes, the calendar on your Android device with Gmail, or the Outlook email on your Windows Phone with Exchange, then you understand the importance of sync.  In my experience architecting and building enterprise mobile apps for the world’s largest organizations over the last decade, data sync has always been a critical ingredient.

The new Sync Framework Toolkit found on MSDN builds on the existing Sync Framework 2.1′s ability to create disconnected applications, making it easier to expose data for synchronization to apps running on any client platform.  Where Sync Framework 2.1 required clients to be based on Windows, this free toolkit allows other Microsoft platforms to be used for offline clients such as Silverlight, Windows Phone 7, Windows Mobile, Windows Embedded Handheld, and new Windows Slates.   Additionally, non-Microsoft platforms such as iPhones, iPads, Android phones and tablets, Blackberries and browsers supporting HTML5 are all first-class sync citizens.  The secret is that we no longer require the installation of the Sync Framework runtime on client devices.  When coupled with use of an open protocol like OData for data transport, no platform or programming language is prevented from synchronizing data with our on-premise and cloud databases.  When the data arrives on your device, you can serialize it as JSON, or insert it into SQL Server Compact or SQLite depending on your platform preferences.

The Sync Framework Toolkit provides all the features enabled by theSync Framework 4.0 October 2010 CTP.  We are releasing the toolkit as source code samples on MSDN with the source code utilizing Sync Framework 2.1.  Source code provides the flexibility to customize or extend the capabilities we have provided to suit your specific requirements. The client-side source code in the package is released under the Apache 2.0 license and the server-side source code under the MS-LPL license.  The Sync Framework 2.1 is fully supported by Microsoft and the mobile-enabling source code is yours to use, build upon, and support for the apps you create.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now some of you might be wondering why you would use a sync technology to move data rather than SOAP or REST web services.  The reason has to do with performance and bandwidth efficiency.  Using SOA, one would retrieve all the data needed to the device in order to see what has changed in SQL Server.  The same goes for uploading data.  Using the Sync Framework Toolkit, only the changes, or deltas, are transmitted over the air.  The boosts performance and reduces bandwidth usage which saves time and money in a world of congested mobile data networks with capped mobile data plans.  You also get a feature called batching, which breaks up the data sent over wireless networks into manageable pieces.  This not only prevents you from blowing out your limited bandwidth, but it also keeps you from using too much RAM memory both on the server and your memory-constrained mobile device.  When combined with conflict resolution and advanced filtering, I’m sold!

I think you’ll find the Sync Framework Toolkit to be an immensely valuable component of your MEAP solutions for the enterprise as well as the ones you build for consumers.

Keep Synching,

Rob

 

Consumerization of IT Collides with MEAP: Windows > Cloud

Posted by Rob Tiffany on August 9, 2011
Posted in: MEAP. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 1 comment

In my Consumerization of IT Collides with MEAP article last week, I described how to connect a Windows 7 device to Microsoft’s On-Premises servers.  Whether you’re talking about a Windows 7 tablet or laptop, I showed that you can follow the Garter MEAP Critical Capabilities to integrate with our stack in a consistent manner.  Remember, the ability to support multiple mobile apps across multiple mobile platforms, using the same software stack is a key tenant to MEAP.  It’s all about avoiding point solutions.

If you need a refresher on the Gartner MEAP Critical Capabilities, check out: http://robtiffany.com/meap/consumerization-of-it-collides-with-meap-windows-on-premises 

In this week’s scenario, I’ll use the picture below to illustrate how Mobile versions of Windows 7 in the form of slates, laptops, and tablets utilize some or all of Gartner’s Critical Capabilities to connect to Microsoft’s Cloud infrastructure:

image

As you can see from the picture above:

  1. For the Management Tools Critical Capability, Windows 7 uses Windows Intune for Cloud-based device management and software distribution.
  2. For both the Client and Server Integrated Development Environment (IDE) and Multichannel Tool Critical Capability, Windows 7 uses Visual Studio. The Windows Azure SDK plugs into Visual Studio and provides developers with everything they need to build Cloud applications.  It even includes a Cloud emulator to simulate all aspects of Windows Azure on their development computer.
  3. For the cross-platform Application Client Runtime Critical Capability, Windows 7 uses .NET (Silverlight/WPF/WinForms) for thick clients. For thin clients, it uses Internet Explorer 9 to provide HTML5 + CSS3 + ECMAScript5 capabilities. Offline storage is important to keep potentially disconnected mobile clients working and this is facilitated by SQL Server Compact + Isolated Storage for thick clients and Web Storage for thin clients.
  4. For the Security Critical Capability, Windows 7 provides security for data at rest via Bitlocker, data in transit via SSL, & Authorization/Authentication via the Windows Azure AppFabric Access Control Serivce (ACS).
  5. For the Enterprise Application Integration Tools Critical Capability, Windows 7 can reach out to servers directly via Web Services or indirectly through the Cloud via the Windows Azure AppFabric Service Bus to connect to other enterprise packages.
  6. The Multichannel Server Critical Capability to support any open protocol is handled automatically by Windows Azure. Crosss-Platform wire protocols riding on top of HTTP are exposed by Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and include SOAP, REST and Atompub. Cross-Platform data serialization is also provided by WCF including XML, JSON, and OData. Cross-Platform data synchronization if provided by the Sync Framework. These Multichannel capabilities support thick clients making web service calls as well as thin web clients making Ajax calls. Distributed caching to dramatically boost the performance of any client is provided by Windows Azure AppFabric Caching.
  7. As you might imagine, the Hosting Critical Capability is knocked out of the park with Windows Azure.  Beyond providing the most complete solution of any Cloud provider, Windows Azure Connect provides an IPSec-protected connection with your On-Premises network and SQL Azure Data Sync can be used to move data between SQL Server and SQL Azure.  This gives you the Hybrid Cloud solution you might be looking for.
  8. For the Packaged Mobile Apps or Components Critical Capability, Windows 7 runs cross-platform mobile apps include Office/Lync/IE/Outlook/Bing.

As you can see from this and last week’s article, Windows 7 meets all of Gartner’s Critical Capabilities whether it’s connecting to Microsoft’s On-Premises or Cloud servers and infrastructure.  They great takeaway from the picture above, is Windows 7 only needs to know how to integrate its apps with WCF in the exact same way as is does in the On-Premises scenario.  Windows developers can focus on Windows without having to concern themselves with the various options provided by Windows Azure.  Cloud developers just need to provide a WCF interface to the mobile clients.

When an employee walks in the door with a wireless Windows 7 Slate device, you can rest assured that you can make them productive via Windows Azure without sacrificing any of the Gartner Critical Capabilities.

Next week, I’ll cover how Windows Phone connects to an On-Premises Microsoft infrastructure.

Best Regards,

Rob

SQL Server Compact 4.0 Lands on the Web

Posted by Rob Tiffany on January 17, 2011
Posted in: SQL Server Compact. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Leave a Comment

A decade has passed since I first started using SQL CE on my Compaq iPAQ.  What started as a great upgrade to Pocket Access turned into the ultimate embedded database for Windows CE, the Pocket PC, Windows Mobile and Windows Phones.  The one-two punch of Outlook Mobile synchronizing email with Exchange and SQL Server Compact synchronizing data with SQL Server helped set the mobile enterprise on fire.  In 2005, version 3.0 supported Windows Tablets and progressive enhancements to the code base led to full Windows support on both x86 and x64 platforms.  With the new version 4.0, the little-database-that-could has grown up into a powerful server database ready to take on the web. 

We’ve come a long way and you’re probably wondering what qualifies this new embedded database to take on the Internet:

  • Native support for x64 Windows Servers
  • Virtual memory usage has been optimized to ensure the database can support up to 256 open connections – (Are you actually using 256 pooled connections with your “Big” database today?)
  • Supports databases up to 4 GB in size – (Feel free to implement your own data sharding schemeSQL Server Compact)
  • Developed, stress-tested, and tuned to support ASP.NET web applications
  • Avoids the interprocess communications performance hit by running in-process with your web application
  • Row-level locking to boost concurrency
  • Step up to Government + Military grade security SHA2 algorithm to secure data with FIPS compliance
  • Enhanced data reliability via true atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability (ACID) support
  • Transaction support to commit and roll back grouped changes
  • Full referential integrity with cascading deletes and updates
  • Support ADO.NET Entity Framework 4 – (Do I hear WCF Data Services?)
  • Paging queries are supported via T-SQL syntax to only return the data you actually need

Wow, that’s quite a list!  SQL Server Compact 4.0 databases are easily developed using the new WebMatrix IDE or through Visual Studio 2010 SP1.  I’m loving the new ASP.NET Web Pages.  It reminds me of the good old days of building web applications with Classic ASP back in the 90′s with Visual InterDev and Homesite.

What about Mobility?

Since SQL Server Compact owes its heritage to mobile and embedded versions of Windows, you might be wanting to know what our story is there.  The good news is that you can build and deploy v4.0 databases on Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Windows 7.  If you want to implement an occasionally-connected solution that utilizes the Sync Framework, Remote Data Access (RDA), or Merge Replication, you’ll need to stick with SQL Server Compact 3.5 SP2.  Time and resource-constraints prevented the Compact team from enabling these features.  Luckily, single-user WPF/WinForms database applications running on Windows Slates, laptops and Windows Embedded Handheld devices will work just fine with the v3.5 SP2 runtime.  Get a jumpstart with this by pickup up “Enterprise Data Synchronization with Microsoft SQL Server 2008 and SQL Server Compact 3.5 Mobile Merge Replication” at   http://www.amazon.com/Enterprise-Synchronization-Microsoft-Compact-Replication/dp/0979891213/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1281715114&sr=1-1 to start building those MEAP solutions.

With the tidal wave of Windows Slates hitting the market, a secure, powerful mobile database that allows users to work offline and syncs with SQL Server is definitely going to be a hot item!

So run, don’t walk to the Microsoft Download site to download the Next-Gen database for the web:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=033cfb76-5382-44fb-bc7e-b3c8174832e2

If you need to support occasionally-connected mobile applications with sync capabilities on muliple Windows platforms, download SQL Server Compact 3.5 SP2:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=e497988a-c93a-404c-b161-3a0b323dce24

Keep Syncing,

Rob

Reducing SQL Server Sync I/O Contention :: Tip 3

Posted by Rob Tiffany on January 10, 2011
Posted in: SQL Server. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 3 comments
GUIDs and Clustered Indexes

Uniqueness is a key factor when synchronizing data between SQL Server/Azure and multiple endpoints like Slates and Smartphones.  With data simultaneously created and updated on servers and clients, ensuring rows are unique to avoid key collisions is critical.  As you know, each row is uniquely identified by its Primary Key.

Primary Key

When creating Primary Keys, it’s common to use a compound key based on things like account numbers, insert time and other appropriate business items.  It’s even more popular to create Identity Columns for the Primary Key based on an Int or BigInt data type based on what I see from my customers.  When you designate a column(s) to be a Primary Key, SQL Server automatically makes it a Clustered Index.  Clustered indexes are faster than normal indexes for sequential values because the B-Tree leaf nodes are the actual data pages on disk, rather than just pointers to data pages.

While Identity Columns work well in most database situations, they often break down in a data synchronization scenario since multiple clients could find themselves creating new rows using the same key value.  When these clients sync their data with SQL Server, key collisions would occur.  Merge Replication includes a feature that hands out blocks of Identity Ranges to each client to prevent this. 

When using other Microsoft sync technologies like the Sync Framework or RDA, no such Identity Range mechanism exists and therefore I often see GUIDs utilized as Primary Keys to ensure uniqueness across all endpoints.  In fact, I see this more and more with Merge Replication too since SQL Server adds a GUID column to the end of each row for tracking purposes anyway.  Two birds get killed with one Uniqueidentifier stone. 

Using the Uniqueidentifier data type is not necessarily a bad idea.  Despite the tradeoff of reduced join performance vs. integers, the solved uniqueness problem allows sync pros to sleep better at night.  The primary drawback with using GUIDs as Primary Keys goes back to the fact that SQL Server automatically gives those columns a Clustered Index.

I thought Clustered Indexes were a good thing?

They are a good thing when the values found in the indexed column are sequential.  Unfortunately, GUIDs generated with the default NewId() function are completely random and therefore create a serious performance problem.  All those mobile devices uploading captured data means lots of Inserts for SQL Server.  Inserting random key values like GUIDs can cause fragmentation in excess of 90% because new pages have to be allocated with rows pushed to the new page in order to insert the record on the existing page.  This performance-killing, space-wasting page splitting wouldn’t happen with sequential Integers or Datetime values since they actually help fill the existing page.

 What about NEWSEQUENTIALID()?

Generating your GUIDs on SQL Server with this function will dramatically reduce fragmentation and wasted space since it guarantees that each GUID will be sequential.  Unfortunately, this isn’t bulletproof.  If your Windows Server is restarted for any reason, your GUIDs may start from a lower range.  They’ll still be globally unique, but your fragmentation will increase and performance will decrease.  Also keep in mind that all the devices synchronizing with SQL Server will be creating their own GUIDs which blows the whole NEWSEQUENTIALID() strategy out of the water.

Takeaway

If you’re going to use the Uniqueidentifier data type for your Primary Keys and you plan to sync your data with RDA, the Sync Framework or Merge Replication, ensure that Create as Clustered == No for better performance.  You’ll still get fragmentation, but it will be closer to the ~30% range instead almost 100%.

Keep synching

Rob

Reducing SQL Server I/O Contention during Sync :: Tip 2

Posted by Rob Tiffany on January 7, 2011
Posted in: SQL Server. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Leave a Comment
Indexing Join Columns

In my last Sync/Contention post, I beat up on a select group of SAN administrators who aren’t willing to go the extra mile to optimize the very heart of their organization, SQL Server.  You guys know who you are.

This time, I want to look at something more basic, yet often overlooked.

All DBAs know that Joining tables on non-indexed columns is the most expensive operation SQL Server can perform.  Amazingly, I run into this problem over and over with many of my customers.  Sync technologies like the Sync Framework, RDA and Merge Replication allow for varying levels of server-side filtering.  This is a popular feature used to reduce the size of the tables and rows being downloaded to Silverlight Isolated Storage or SQL Server Compact. 

It’s also a performance killer when tables and columns participating in a Join filter are not properly indexed.  Keeping rows locked longer than necessary creates undue blocking and deadlocking.  It also creates unhappy slate and smartphone users who have to wait longer for their sync to complete.

Do yourselft a favor and go take a look at all the filters you’ve created and makes sure that you have indexes on all those Joined columns.

Keep synching,

Rob